Friday, October 7, 2011

Decade of War

Today marked the tenth year of war in Afghanistan. Ten years, almost three thousand coalition casualties, uncounted Afghan casualties, $455.4 billion to wage war in a country with a GDP of $16.63 billion- and for what? The violence continues, the horrible repression of women goes on... what the hell have we accomplished?

A few years back, my mother reminded me of a conversation that we had around Easter time in 2001, shortly after the destruction of the Buddhas of Bamiyan, during which I said that I thought that war with the Taliban would be inevitable. I'd forgotten the conversation, but mom brought it up years later, when my baby brother, Gomez, was going to Kandahar for the first time. My brother Vincenzo is there now- my two younger brothers spent some weeks together there earlier this year. Of course, both of them have also done tours in Iraq. As you can surmise, I take the awful, awful foreign policy of the U.S. personally.

I could write about the U.S. failure to systematically build a sane, stable society in post-invasion Afghanistan, but that's not really what I want to rant about. The real failure of U.S. foreign policy in Afghanistan goes back decades, when the U.S. armed and trained religious fanatics to fight a proxy war against the U.S.S.R.. American spooks taught the mujahideen how to deploy Improvised Explosive Devices and how to shoot down advanced military helicopters (yet another case of Chinooks chickens coming home to roost).

When the Afghans finally drove the Soviets out, where the hell was our State Department, giving the Afghans aid in building a civil society? There was a time when we treated our enemies better than we were treating our allies. We didn't drain the swamp, and now we're futilely trying to swat mosquitoes (albeit ones carrying a virulent disease) with sledgehammers. Ten years of war, thirty-two years of immoral, poorly thought-out foreign policy, and what positive outcome is possible?

5 comments:

Johnny Pez said...

what positive outcome is possible?

3) PROFIT!!!

ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© said...

When the Afghans finally drove the Soviets out, where the hell was our State Department, giving the Afghans aid in building a civil society?

Busy helping Pakistan (not to mention, Saudi Arabia) who in their turn were doing their best to make sure religious fundamentalists held sway.

The whole thing is insane, but continues because it satisfies the pockets of certain well-heeled and thus overly-influential parties.

And because we don't have an actual opposition party in this country.
~

Big Bad Bald Bastard said...

3) PROFIT!!!

That was certainly the case in Iraq!

The whole thing is insane, but continues because it satisfies the pockets of certain well-heeled and thus overly-influential parties.

Yeah, but it's just not sustainable... we're pretty much doomed!

Laura said...

Sounds like you've got enough brothers to keep the U.S. in military single handedly! :)

((Hugs))
Laura

Smut Clyde said...

When the Afghans finally drove the Soviets out

One faction of Afghans, anyway.
Seems to me that Afghanistan did used to have a nascent civil society, with a progressive government; but the government had the misfortune of receiving Soviet support, so the US built up an alliance of religious fanatics and corrupt regional warlords to serve as their proxy army to overthrow it.

So back then the US decided that peace & stability in Afghanistan was less important than an opportunity to embarrass Gorbachev. The Afghans were disposable collateral damage then; I'm not expecting them to suddenly become important.