Damn, I don't even think Mitt Romney's really campaigning at this point... he's just trolling now. In a comment about the State Department's handling of a Chinese dissident, Mitt actually said (emphasis mine):
"The reports are, if they are accurate, that our administration wittingly or unwittingly communicated to Chen an implicit threat to his family and also probably sped up or may have sped up the process of his decision to leave the embassy. If these reports are true, this is a dark day for freedom, and it's a day of shame for the Obama administration."
Sweet tittyfucking Jesus, he's just trolling at this point. Mitt's got a problem with talking about stuff he doesn't know shit about. If his mouth is open, he's either lying, or he's talking smack without the facts. The article wryly notes: Romney did not specify how he would have handled the incident, and his campaign has not offered a more detailed response. Yeah, he's just trolling, he has no answers, he just makes demands of the Presnit without having a grasp of the facts.
The final awful Mitt bit is the lame, hypocritical platitude-cum-accusation: "We should defend (freedom) when it's under attack." Too bad the asshole can't follow his own advice.
He could have strolled over to the State Department's website and read the briefings.
ReplyDeleteTake heart, B^4. 5 years ago, he would have offered a full-throated endorsement of the administration's actions.
ReplyDeleteNow?!?!?
ReplyDelete"Mitt bit"...
ReplyDeleteTee hee... ;)
((Hugs))
Laura
Freedom™ needs a ™.
ReplyDeleteUse of Freedom™ without authorized consent of the Department of Homeland Security is strictly prohibited.
~
He could have strolled over to the State Department's website and read the briefings.
ReplyDeleteHe could have kept his mouth shut, not knowing the facts.
Take heart, B^4. 5 years ago, he would have offered a full-throated endorsement of the administration's actions.
No doubt- he also would have kept his big gay foreign policy advisor.
Now?!?!?
I guess your right, but this was so blatant, it's not even real campaigning.
"Mitt bit"...
Tee hee... ;)
Mitt sandwich, Mitt for brains, don't know Mitt...
Freedom™ needs a ™.
ReplyDeleteFreedumb, brought to you by KBR and the Heritage Foundation...
Has anyone thought of "Mitt Wit" yet?
ReplyDeleteI hope not! Wheeeeeee!
Good one!
ReplyDelete"We should defend (freedom) when it's under attack," Romney said.
ReplyDeleteThe freedom to have a job, for instance.
Hey, Thunder's inciting me! I can't be responsible for my actions after reading stuff like that.
ReplyDeleteAlthough six more mos. of this campaign trolling will turn my mind to mush & I won't even be responsible for bowel function.